With the demand for privacy increasing, what is the difference between UltraSonic phone jamming and traditional phone jammers?
Traditional phone jamming utilizes an RF signal to block cellular tower communications and is illegal in most countries, while Ultrasonic jamming involves transmitting an inaudible audio signal to disable any microphones and is legal in most countries.
The advantages to UltraSonic recording blockers are many. They are legal as well as effective against more recording devices than just cellular phones. They do not interfere with emergency communications or cellular links. They allow you to ensure privacy in specific locations such as boardrooms, offices, etc., without customers and clients noticing.
The market is flooded with ‘low cost’ ultrasonic recording jammers and blockers, but are they really a good deal? The price may seem too good to be true and that is most often the case. Many pitfalls of these cheap devices include poor build quality due to being made overseas, inferior signals being used which do not completely block speech, as well as lack of compatibility with devices. While the ‘cheap’ units may be effective against recording by a simple tape recorder, they most often are completely ineffective at blocking recordings used by newer devices such as iphones and ipads.
As opposed to the inferior products, Silentek’s products are all designed, tested and manufactured by us. We use a complex jamming signal that cannot be removed from recordings and our devices are effective against all recording devices, including iphones, ipads, hidden wires and any other microphone-based eavesdropping device.
For the best privacy protection, trust Silentek. Check out our collection of privacy products here
